Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology ; (12): 527-535, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-990878

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the effect of distilled water on the viability of human lens epithelial cells (LECs) cultured in vitro. Methods:A total of 156 anterior capsule specimens were collected from 156 patients (156 eyes) who were diagnosed with age-related cataract during phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation from May to December 2020 in Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School.The 156 specimens were divided into 312 small pieces.Of the 312 pieces, 157 pieces were divided into normal control group (23 pieces), positive control group (10 pieces), balanced salt solution (BSS) immersion group (61 pieces) and distilled water immersion group (63 pieces) using computer-generated random numbers.Normal control group received no treatment.Positive control group was directly fixed with a mass fraction of 4% histiocytes fixative solution.For the 61 pieces in BSS immersion group, 20 pieces were soaked for 1 minute, 21 pieces for 2 minutes, and 20 pieces for 3 minutes.For the 63 pieces in distilled water immersion group, 20 pieces were soaked for 1 minute, 23 pieces for 2 minutes, and 20 pieces for 3 minutes.Another 125 pieces were selected to simulate the cataract aspiration-irrigation according to the treatment in BSS immersion group and distilled water immersion group respectively, plus rinse in a bottle containing BSS at a height of 70 cm for 1 minute.Cell viability was detected by trypan blue-eosin staining.LECs density, dead cell count, cell death rate and percentage of shedding (%) were calculated.Of the remaining 30 pieces, every 15 pieces were divided into normal control group, BSS immersion group, and distilled water immersion for 1, 2 and 3 minutes groups, with 3 pieces in each group.BSS immersion group was immersed for 3 minutes, and the other four groups were treated as mentioned above, and the LECs structure of the four groups was observed by light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School (No.2019-248-01). Written informed consent was obtained from each subject.Results:The boundaries of LECs in BSS treatment groups were clear, and there was no significant difference in morphology compared with normal control group.With time increasing, LECs in distilled water treatment groups gradually swelled, and the boundaries of dead cells were not clear.There were significant differences in LECs density, dead LECs count and LECs mortality ( F=13.459, 98.918, 130.600; all at P<0.001). The LECs density was lower in 2-minute and 3-minute distilled water treatment groups than in normal control group, showing statistically significant differences (both at P<0.05). The dead LECs count and LECs mortality were higher in 1-minute, 2-minute and 3-minute distilled water treatment groups than in normal control group and BSS treatment groups for the same time, and the differences were statistically significant (all at P<0.05). Only a few shed LECs were seen in normal control group, 1-minute, 2-minute and 3-minute BSS treatment groups, and BSS immersion combined rinse group.After different time of soaking, there were more shed LECs in distilled water immersion combined rinse group, and the range of LECs shedding increased with the extension of distilled water immersion.There was a significant difference in the shedding percentage of LECs among different groups ( F=123.670, P<0.001). The shedding percentages of LECs at different time points were higher in distilled water immersion groups and distilled water immersion combined rinse groups than in normal control group, and the difference was statistically significant (all at P<0.05). The shedding percentage of LECs increased significantly in distilled water immersion groups with the extension of immersion.Light microscopy showed that the cells were destroyed in 1-minute, 2-minute and 3-minute distilled water treatment groups, and some LECs shed in the 2-minute and 3-minute treatment groups.Transmission electron microscopy showed cell lysis and destruction, suborganelles swelling, disruption of intercellular junctions in 1-minute, 2-minute and 3-minute distilled water treatment groups, loose attachment between cells and capsule in the 2-minute and 3-minute treatment groups, and cell detachment from capsule in the 3-minute treatment group. Conclusions:Distilled water immersion leads to LECs death in a time-dependent manner, and distilled water immersion combined with rinse can remove LECs on the lens capsule.

2.
Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology ; (12): 454-460, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-931094

ABSTRACT

Objective:To compare the one-year postoperative visual quality after trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and monofocal IOL implantation.Methods:A cohort study was conducted.Forty-one eyes from 41 age-related cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification extraction combined with IOL implantation in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from May 2017 to June 2018 were enrolled.The patients were divided into trifocal IOL group (20 eyes) receiving ZEISS AT LISA tri 839MP trifocal IOL implantation and monofocal IOL group (21 eyes) receiving ZEISS 603P monofocal IOL implantation according to their willingness.One year after surgery, uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) and distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) were detected in both groups.The patient point spread function (PSF), modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio (SR), OQAS Ⅱ values at 100%, 20%, and 9% contrast (OV 100%, OV 20%, OV 9%) and objective scattering index (OSI) were measured by OQAS Ⅱ.Wavefront aberrations including total aberration (TA), total high order aberrations (tHOAs), spherical aberration, coma, trefoil aberration, total low order aberrations (tLOAs), defocus, and astigmatism were evaluated with the iTrace visual function analyzer.All aberrations were represented by root mean square.The visual acuity of operative eyes was measured with a phoropter, and defocus curves were drawn with visual acuity better than 0.5 LogMAR.The incidence of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) in the IOL region was quantitatively analyzed by Sellman method.Visual function was scored by visual function index (VF-14). This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by an Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School (No.2018-219-01). Written informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to any medical examination.Results:One year after the operation, UCIVA, UCNVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA of trifocal IOL group were significantly better than those of monofocal IOL group, and the differences were statistically significant (all at P<0.001). OQAS Ⅱ visual quality indicators showed that the MTF cutoff frequency, SR, OV 100%, and OSI values of trifocal IOL group were significantly higher than those of monofocal IOL group, showing statistically significant differences (all at P<0.001). No significant difference in wavefront aberrations was found between the two groups (all at P>0.05). Defocus curve showed that the LogMAR visual acuity of patients at -1.0 D, -1.5 D, -2.0 D, -2.5 D, -3.0 D, and -3.5 D (namely, 1 m, 66 cm, 50 cm, 40 cm, 33 cm, and 29 cm) in monofocal IOL group were significantly better than those in trifocal IOL group (all at P<0.05). There was a higher incidence of PCO in trifocal IOL group than monofocal IOL group, with a statistically significant difference ( χ 2=41.0, P<0.001). The VF-14 score of trifocal IOL group was 87.99±1.09, which was significantly higher than 81.49±1.67 of monofocal IOL group ( t=10.301, P<0.001). Conclusions:One year after trifocal IOL implantation, the full range of vision, subjective and objective visual quality of eyes are better than eyes implanted with monofocal IOL.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL